| 
	
		
				
			
				Development of Nurse Presence Scale														
			
			Kae Hwa Jo, Young Suk Cho			
				Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing 2001;31(3):369-379.   Published online March 29, 2017			
									DOI: https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2001.31.3.369
							
							 
				
										
										 Abstract  PDF
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to develop the Nurse Presence Scale and to test the 
reliability and validity of the instrument. METHOD: The subjects verifying the scale's reliability and 
validity were adult patients being treated in three artificial kidney unit in Pusan and Taegu from 
August 1 to October 15, 2000. The data was analyzed by the SPSS/WIN 8.0 program. RESULT: A 
factor analysis and was conducted items that had a factor loading more than .40, and an eigen value 
more than 1.0 were seleclted. The factor analysis classified a total of seven factors statistically, but 
the seventh factor was excluded because communality was less than 4%. Therefore, there were six 
factors, and its communality was 62%. The explanation of domain and factors based on the conceptual 
framework and item content are as follows: The first factor was 'interaction' in emotional areas, the 
second domain was 'empathy' in cognitive areas, the third was 'attention' in emotional areas, the 
fourth was 'openness' in emotional areas, the fifth was 'sensitivity' in behavioral areas, and the sixth 
was 'physical assist' in behavioral areas. Cronbach's alpa coefficient to test reliability of the scale was 
.9766 for a total 49 items. CONCLUSION: The Scale for Nurse Presence developed in the study was 
identified as a tool with a high degree of reliability and validity. Therefore, this scale can be 
effectively utilized for the evaluation of nurse presence in clinical settings.
					Citations Citations to this article as recorded by   Effects of Nurse Presence Program on Anxiety and Physiological Indicators in Patients with Gynecological SurgeryYun Jeong Kim, Kae Hwa Jo
 Journal of Korean Biological Nursing Science.2014; 16(4): 326.     CrossRef
 
		
			456
			View
		
			3
			Download
		
			1
			Crossref
		 |