| 
	
		
				
			
				A Validation Study of the Modified Korean Version of Ethical Leadership at Work Questionnaire (K-ELW)														
			
			Jeong-Eon Kim, Eun-Jun Park			
				J Korean Acad Nurs 2015;45(2):240-250.   Published online April 30, 2015			
									DOI: https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2015.45.2.240
							
							 
				
										
										 Abstract  PDF
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to validate the Korean version of the Ethical Leadership at Work questionnaire (K-ELW) that measures RNs' perceived ethical leadership of their nurse managers.Methods The strong validation process suggested by Benson (1998), including translation and cultural adaptation stage, structural stage, and external stage, was used. Participants were 241 RNs who reported their perceived ethical leadership using both the pre-version of K-ELW and a previously known Ethical Leadership Scale, and interactional justice of their managers, as well as their own demographics, organizational commitment and organizational citizenship behavior. Data analyses included descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation coefficients, reliability coefficients, exploratory factor analysis, and confirmatory factor analysis. SPSS 19.0 and Amos 18.0 versions were used.Results A modified K-ELW was developed from construct validity evidence and included 31 items in 7 domains: People orientation, task responsibility fairness, relationship fairness, power sharing, concern for sustainability, ethical guidance, and integrity. Convergent validity, discriminant validity, and concurrent validity were supported according to the correlation coefficients of the 7 domains with other measures.Conclusion The results of this study provide preliminary evidence that the modified K-ELW can be adopted in Korean nursing organizations, and reliable and valid ethical leadership scores can be expected.
					Citations Citations to this article as recorded by   Psychometric properties of the Turkish Ethical Leadership at Work QuestionnaireEmrah Özsoy, Mark D. Griffiths, Meliha Ceylan
 Cogent Psychology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
Effect of Nursing Managers’ Ethical Leadership on Clinical Nurse Empowerment, Performance, and Organizational CommitmentJihun Kim, Seok Hee Jeong, Hee Sun Kim, Myung Ha Lee
 Journal of Nursing Research.2025; 33(4): e400.     CrossRef
Psychometric Characteristics of the Serbian Version of the Ethical Leadership at Work Questionnaire (ELW-RS)Nikola Goljović
 Primenjena psihologija.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
Subjectivity Study on Ethical Leadership for Fire Officials in Disaster Response Situations: Focusing on 119 Safety Experience Center at “A” Fire and Disaster HeadquartersSeunghoon Ryu
 Journal of the Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation.2024; 24(6): 145.     CrossRef
Influence of Ethical Leadership of Nursing Unit Managers on Job Embeddedness of Staff Nurses: Focusing on Mediating Effect of Trust in SupervisorSunmi Kim, Seohee Jeong, Seok Hee Jeong, Myung Ha Lee
 Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration.2021; 27(1): 21.     CrossRef
Research on How Emotional Expressions of Emotional Labor Workers and Perception of Customer Feedbacks Affect Turnover Intentions: Emphasis on Moderating Effects of Emotional IntelligenceYoung Hee Lee, Suk Hyung Bryan Lee, Jong Yong Chung
 Frontiers in Psychology.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
Impact of ethical factors on job satisfaction among Korean nursesYujin Jang, Younjae Oh
 Nursing Ethics.2019; 26(4): 1186.     CrossRef
An ethical leadership program for nursing unit managersSang Hee Jeon, Mihyun Park, Kyungok Choi, Mi Kyoung Kim
 Nurse Education Today.2018; 62: 30.     CrossRef
Impact of Superior's Ethical Leadership as Perceived by Nurses on Nursing Performance: Mediating Effect of Faith in SupervisorMiyoung Kim, Hyung-Eun Seo, Eun-Young Doo, Won-Jin Ju
 Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration.2017; 23(5): 483.     CrossRef
Influence of Head Nurses' Ethical Leadership on Job Satisfaction among Staff Nurses: Mediating Effect of Affective CommitmentMin Jung
 Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration.2016; 22(5): 553.     CrossRef
 
		
			996
			View
		
			20
			Download
		
			10
			Crossref
		 |